"The psyche is far from being a homogenous unit–on the contrary, it is a boiling cauldron of contradictory impulses, inhibitions, and affects, and for many people the conflict between them is so insupportable that they even wish for the deliverance preached by theologians.[“Psychological Aspects of the Mother Archetype,” CW 9i, para. 190.]The way in which the psyche manifests is a complicated interplay of many factors, including an individual’s age, sex, hereditary disposition, psychological type and attitude, and degree of conscious control over the instincts." (Sharp, 1991). [Read more]
Psyche: "Psyche, the ancient Greek word meaning “soul” or “spirit,” is also the name of the Greek goddess of the Soul, one of whose symbols is the butterfly. The term was employed by Sigmund Freud to describe the unity of unconscious and conscious, the tripartite structure of the mind divided into Id (i.e., the repository of unconscious drives and wishes that determine our conscious behaviors); Super-Ego (i.e., the repository of supercon-scious extreme moralistic elements that compensate for the opposite extremes of the id); and the Ego (i.e., the conscious referee between the dichotomous ongoing conflict between id and superego). It was also adopted by Freud’s student Carl Jung to encompass the mind and its evolving, developing relationship with the world over the course of life, manifest in the individuation of the Self from the more limited ego (Jung, 1978).” [Read more]
Objective Psyche: "In 1633, Galileo Galilei was forced to his knees by the Catholic Church, and with his hands on the Bible, demanded to retract his comments that the earth was not the center of the universe. Drawing on his years of scientific inquiry, he found that it was the earth which rotated around the sun and not the other way around. His was a heliocentric view of the universe, not a geocentric approach. Perhaps using science to refute religious dogma was not the best approach in the 1600s, but Galileo’s search for truth knew no limits. Those near him during the inquisition heard him whisper under his breath the words, eppure si muove (and yet it moves), as he completed his testimony to the Papal See. Eppure si muove speaks to the issue of relative and fixed space and movement. The Church needed to see the earth as center of the universe to justify its position of moral and spiritual supremacy. However, his utterance that “the earth moves” urges us to re-consider the relationship between relative and objective meaning. This theme remains crucial to our understanding not only of the world, but also the human psyche and in many ways has influenced the practice of psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. Jung’s discovery of the Objective Psyche closely parallels Galileo’s findings, in that the ego, like the earth, was not to be viewed as the center of the personality. For Jung, the objective psyche allows us to determine the distinction between a relative and subjectively derived meaning from what is objective and invariant. While in relation to the ego, the matrix for this objective psyche exists independently of the conscious mind, and its contents are not acquired through personal experience. Like a compass pointing due north or a bird’s innate capacity for building intricate nests and traveling thousands of miles during its migratory journeys, there is an internal wisdom and directionality within the psyche- a psychic “due north.” [Read more]
Jung, C. G. (1966). The relations between the ego and the unconscious (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 7. Two essays on analytical psychology (2nd ed., pp. 121–241). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1928) https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400850891.121
Jung, C. G. (1969). The structure of the psyche (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 8. Structure and dynamics of the psyche (2nd ed., pp. 139-158). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1931) https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400850952.139
Jung, C. G. (1969). Basic postulates of analytical psychology (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 8. Structure and dynamics of the psyche (2nd ed., pp. 338-357). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1934) https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400850952.338
Jung, C. G. (1969). On the nature of the psyche (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 8. Structure and dynamics of the psyche (2nd ed., pp. 159-234). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1954) https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400850952.159
Books available from the library:
Journal articles available from the library:
Colman, W. (2017). Soul in the world: Symbolic culture as the medium for psyche. The Journal of Analytical Psychology, 62(1), 32–49.
Abstract: Whilst the loss of a sense of living connection with the material world is mainly associated with the scientific revolution in seventeenth century Europe, it can be traced back to Plato's introduction of a hierarchy between soul and body. Jung's attempted solution to this—esse in anima— is ingenious but maintains the Cartesian split by which the aliveness of the world is reduced to a projection of psychic forces (the archetypes). An alternative approach is proposed, rooted in the Aristotelean emphasis on practical activity that sees the soul as a function of our way of being in the world. Human cognition is extended and distributed by our social and material engagement with the world, especially via collective representations whose symbolic character is constitutive of the reality of the world in which we live. Despite the dominance of ‘scientific Cartesian’ representations in the modern Western world, there remain numerous instances of participation mystique that cannot be captured by the Cartesian notion of projection. These indicate an opening to ways of being in the world that may lead us out of the impasse of the Cartesian matrix.
Corbett, L., & Whitney, L. (2016). Jung and non-duality: Some clinical and theoretical implications of the self as totality of the psyche. International Journal of Jungian Studies, 8(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409052.2015.1092460
Abstract: Some of Jung's writing reveals a non-dual sensibility, especially when he describes the Self as the totality of the psyche, and in his stress on the unus mundus and synchronicity. But overall he tends to favor a dualistic approach to the psyche; he never relinquishes the importance of the ego, he believes that the Self needs the ego to become conscious of itself, and he does not focus on pure consciousness beyond its images. This paper compares Jung's notion of the Self with descriptions of consciousness in various non-dual religious traditions. We suggest that because the Self is the ultimate subject, it can never be an object of consciousness. We suggest some of the implications of non-dual philosophy for psychotherapy.
Franz, M. L. von. (1975). Psyche and matter in alchemy and modern science. Quadrant, 8(1), 33–49.
Request article from the library
Lockhart, R. A. (1980). Psyche in hiding. Quadrant, 13(1), 76–105.
Request article from the library
Preston, E. M. (1987). Psyche revisited: A contemporary view of feminine consciousness in the myth of Eros and Psyche. Anima, 13((3), (2), 87–96.
Abstract: The myth of Eros and Psyche is found in its earliest extant form in the Metamorphoses or Golden Ass, a novel written in Latin in the Second Century A.D. by Lucius Apuleius. Through the ages the myth has been the subject of many interpretations from a philosophical or religious point of view. The development of depth psychology in modern times and the application of psycho-analytical principles to literature have resulted in interpretations from a psychological point of view. Erich Neumann in Amor and Psyche examined the myth in the light of the theory of C. G. Jung, seeing in it a model for the development of the feminine psyche.: "."
Wolff, T. (1995). Structural forms of the feminine psyche. Psychological Perspectives: A Semiannual Journal of Jungian Thought, 31(1), 77–90.
Abstract: The modern woman may find it valuable for her self-knowledge and self-realization to understand not only her type of attitude (introverted or extraverted) and its predominant, basic psychological function (thinking, feeling, sensation, or intuition), but also the structural form of the psyche that corresponds most closely to her personality. This structural form need not necessarily correspond to her external way of life, nor does it imply anything about her character or her human and cultural level. The external way of life may be chosen for reasons that are not purely conceptual (influences of time and environment, social circumstances, specific abilities). More often than not, the structural form of the feminine psyche will fit into the external way of life only with difficulty, resulting in insecurity and conflict.
Zabriskie, B. (2000). The psyche as a process. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 10((3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481881009348554
Abstract: Replies to 9 questions posed by J. L. Fosshage and J. M. Davies (see record 2000-08298-003 ) about the current theories and practice of Jungian analytic psychology and comments on the case vignette of the analysis of an adult male patient, Andrew, presented in the Fosshage and Davies article. Zabriskie considers Jung's conception of the psyche, perceived by Jung as a dynamic interactive system and a multiplicity within a unity, as his most significant contribution to the clinical practice of analysis and discusses the psyche as it applies to Jung's contribution to depth psychology. Jung's ideas, including those surrounding the psyche, and the author's use of them in analysis are discussed in the following areas: the concept of the self, the centrality of dream analysis and the concept of archetypes, psychoanalytic concepts and their compatibility with Jungian practice, the concepts of transference–countertransference, the analyst's role in the treatment experience, therapeutic change, and the relationship between Jungian analysis and psychoanalysis.