"Jung originally defined his concept, "the Self," (Selbst), as follows:
"As an empirical concept, the Self designates the whole range of psychic phenomena in man. It expresses the unity of the personality as a whole. But insofar as the total personality, because of its unconscious component, can only be partly conscious, the concept of the Self is, in part, only potentially empirical and is to that extent a postulate. In other words, it encompasses both the experienceable and the unexperienceable (or the not-yet experienced). From an intellectual point of view it is only a working hypothesis. Its empirical symbols, on the other hand, very often possess a distinct numinosity, that is, an emotional value. It thus proves to be an archetypal idea . . . which differs from other ideas of the kind in that it occupies a central position befitting the significance of its content and numinosity." [“Definitions: Self” CW 6, para. 789.] [Read more]
"The self appears in dreams, myths, and fairytales in the figure of the “supraordinate personality,” such as a king, hero, prophet, saviour, etc., or in the form of a totality symbol, such as the circle, square, quadratura circuli, cross, etc. When it represents a complexio oppositorum, a union of opposites, it can also appear as a united duality, in the form, for instance, of tao as the interplay of yang and yin, or of the hostile brothers, or of the hero and his adversary (arch-enemy, dragon), Faust and Mephistopheles, etc. Empirically, therefore, the self appears as a play of light and shadow, although conceived as a totality and unity in which the opposites are united." [“On the Nature of the Psyche,” CW 8, p. 223, para. 430.] [Read more]
Self: "Self lies at the heart of Jung’s conceptualizing on the structure and dynamics of the psyche. He first encountered the Self in mid-life during the turbulent years of 1916–1918 while undergoing his “creative illness” following the difficult breakdown of his relationship with Freud. As a result, Jung took mid-life to be universal for experiences of the Self to come into being, a view that has been contested by later analytical psychologists. Jung’s definition of the Self is that it is the totality of the psyche as well as being the prime archetype that keeps the psyche from disintegrating at times of stress. Furthermore, it transcends and goes beyond psyche.” (p. 827) [Read more]
Jung, C. G. (1968). The Self (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 09ii. Aion (2nd ed., pp. 23-35). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1951) https://doi.org/10.1515/978140085094
Jung, C. G. (1968). Christ, a Symbol of the Self (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 09ii. Aion (2nd ed., pp. 36-71). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1951) https://doi.org/10.1515/978140085094
Jung, C. G. (1968). A study in the process of individuation (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 9 pt. 1. Archetypes and the collective unconscious (2nd ed., pp. 290-354). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1950) https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400850969.290
Jung, C. G. (1968). Concerning mandala symbolism (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 9 pt. 1. Archetypes and the collective unconscious (2nd ed., pp. 355-384). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1950) https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400850969.355
Jung, C. G. (1970). The undiscovered self (present and future) (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 10. Civilization in transition (2nd ed., pp. 247-305). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1957) https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400850976.247
Jung, C. G. (1976). Depth psychology and self knowledge (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 18. The Symbolic Life (pp. 1811-1819). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1943)
Jung, C. G. (1971). Definitions: Self (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 6. Psychological Types (pp. 463–470). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1921)
Brooke, R. (2009). The self, the psyche and the world: A phenomenological interpretation. The Journal of Analytical Psychology, 54(5), 601–618. https://doi-org.pgi.idm.oclc.org/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01809.x
Beyerle, T. J., & Beyerle, S. L. (2018). The birth of the higher self in anthroposophic and analytical thought. Jung Journal: Culture & Psyche, 12(2), 68–90. https://doi-org.pgi.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/19342039.2018.1442106
Corbett, L., & Whitney, L. (2016). Jung and non-duality: Some clinical and theoretical implications of the self as totality of the psyche. International Journal of Jungian Studies, 8(1), 15–27.
Dobson, M. D.-S. (2015). Transcendent dimensions of the self: A spiritual home for self psychology? International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 10(1), 1–13.
Edinger, E. F. (1960). The Ego-Self paradox. The Journal of Analytical Psychology, 5(1), 3.
Redfearn, J. W. (1983). Ego and self: Terminology. The Journal of Analytical Psychology, 28(2), 91–106.
Redfearn, J. W. (1977). The self and individuation. The Journal of Analytical Psychology, 22(2), 125–141.
Urban, E. (2005). Fordham, Jung and the self: A re-examination of Fordham’s contribution to Jung’s conceptualization of the self. The Journal of Analytical Psychology, 50(5), 571–594.
Weisstub, E. (1997). Self as the feminine principle. The Journal of Analytical Psychology, 42(3), 425–452.