Unconscious contents are invariably projected at first upon concrete persons and situations. Many projections can ultimately be integrated back into the individual once he has recognized their subjective origin; others resist integration, and although they may be detached from their original objects, they thereupon transfer themselves to the doctor. Among these contents the relation to the parent of opposite sex plays an important part, i.e., the relation of son to mother, daughter to father, and also that of brother to sister. ["The Psychology of the Transference," CW 16, para. 357.][Read more]
A transference is answered by a counter-transference from the analyst when it projects a content of which he is unconscious but which nevertheless exists in him. The counter-transference is then just as useful and meaningful, or as much of a hindrance, as the transference of the patient, according to whether or not it seeks to establish that better rapport which is essential for the realization of certain unconscious contents. Like the transference, the counter-transference is compulsive, a forcible tie, because it creates a "mystical" or unconscious identity with the object [General Aspects of Dream Psychology," CW 8, para. 519.] [Read more]
Transference: ”The idea of transference is at the center of the classical psychoanalytic theory of object relations. Early object-relations patterns, formed by our experiences within the family, become consolidated, and remain relatively fixed throughout adult life. They are revealed as emotional reactions in interpersonal situations which are highly intense and realistically speaking quite improper. Any strong emotional reaction formed quickly in an interpersonal encounter, such as love or hate at first sight represent a transference reaction, i.e., a reaction to a present object which is in reality an acting out of a childhood reaction to one’s parents or other close figures." (p. 919) [Read more]
Jung, C. G. (1961). Therapeutic Principles of Psychoanalysis (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 4. Freud and psychoanalysis (pp. 181-203). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1955)
Jung, C. G. (1961). Some crucial points in psychoanalysis: A correspondence between Dr. Jung and Dr. Loy (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 4. Freud and psychoanalysis (pp. 252-289). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1914)
Jung, C. G. (1966). The psychology of the transference (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 16. Practice of psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 163-323). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1946) https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851003.163
Jung, C. G. (1966). Problems of modern psychotherapy (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 16. Practice of psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 53-75). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1931) https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851003.53
Cambray, J. (2001). Enactments and amplification. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 46(2), 275–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00237
Dieckmann, H. (1976). Transference and Countertransference: Results of a Berlin research group. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 21(1), 25–36.
Fordham, M. (1974). Jung’s conception of transference. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 19(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1974.00001.x
Fordham, M. (1979). Analytical psychology and countertransference. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 15(4), 630–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.1979.10745601
Gordon, R. (1968). Transference as a fulcrum of analysis.Journal of Analytical Psychology, 13(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1968.00109.x
Moura, V. (2014). Learning from the patient: The East, synchronicity and transference in the history of an unknown case of C.G. Jung. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 59(3), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12088
Nuttall, J. (2000). The Rosarium Philosophorum as a universal relational psychology: Jung and object relations. Psychodynamic Counselling, 6(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/135333300362873
Peters, R. (1991). The therapist’s expectations of the transference. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 36(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1991.00077.x
Steinberg, W. (1988). The evolution of Jung’s ideas on the transference. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 33(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1988.00021.x
Tyminski, R. (2011). Medea, Jason, and their illusions of the Golden Fleece: A Jungian contribution to transference dreaming. International Journal of Jungian Studies, 3(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409052.2011.542370
Ulanov, A. B. (1997). Transference, the transcendent function, and transcendence. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 42(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1997.00119.x
Zabriskie, B. D. (1997). Thawing the “frozen accidents” The archetypal view in countertransference. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 42(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1997.00025.x